Reviewed by Heard & Believed · Updated 2026-07-28
A new provision tucked into North Carolina's state budget seals the identifying details of students found responsible for sexual misconduct at UNC system schools and community colleges. Survivor advocates call it a privacy win. Here is what the change actually means if you're a student in North Carolina, or weighing a similar step anywhere else.
Figures drawn from North Carolina's 2026 state budget provision and reporting on the law's passage and its legislative history.
North Carolina's governor signed a state budget this week that includes a measure known as the Protect Campus Survivors Act. From now on, any disciplinary file at a UNC system school or a community college that could reveal who a student is, including a name or a student ID number, stays out of reach of a public records request, even for cases tied to violent crimes or sexual misconduct.
Schools can still release aggregated information, such as how many misconduct findings occurred in a given year or general summaries of policy violations, just not anything that would point back to a specific student. Lawmakers had tried to pass a standalone version of this bill in the past, without success, before folding it into this year's budget.
The change directly reverses a 2020 ruling from the North Carolina Supreme Court, which found that university disciplinary records identifying students found responsible for certain violent or sexual offenses were public record under state law. That ruling came out of a years-long legal fight brought by a student newspaper seeking to understand how a university had handled misconduct complaints.
Since then, members of the public, including journalists and researchers, had been able to request those identifying records to evaluate how seriously schools were taking complaints. This year's budget provision closes that door for identifying information going forward, while leaving room for schools to share numbers and patterns instead.
Groups that work directly with survivors have generally welcomed the change. Their argument is straightforward: on a campus, a case record naming a responsible student can also, indirectly, identify the person who reported them, simply because so many people know who was involved with whom. A supporter of the measure from a statewide sexual assault coalition described the goal as releasing useful information about how schools are handling cases while still protecting the privacy of the people involved.
For a survivor already weighing whether to report at all, the fear of being identified by association, even without their name ever appearing anywhere, can be its own real barrier. Advocates argue that narrowing what becomes public record removes one more reason to stay silent.
Not everyone sees it that way. Attorneys and open-government groups who fought for the original 2020 ruling argue that sealing these records makes it harder for the public, including other students, to know whether a school properly investigated a serious complaint or quietly let it go. One longtime public-records advocate described the change as allowing discipline to happen in the dark, warning it could make it harder to hold universities accountable for how they respond to misconduct.
Both sides are responding to the same underlying problem: campus disciplinary systems have long struggled to balance a survivor's privacy against everyone else's interest in knowing whether a school is actually doing its job. This law answers that question one way for North Carolina; other states have answered it differently, and the debate is far from settled nationally.
If you're a student in North Carolina weighing whether to report an assault, this change does not alter your own privacy protections, which schools generally already extend to reporting students separately from whatever record exists about the person accused. What it changes is who, outside the process, can later request identifying details about the outcome.
If you're anywhere else and this story simply resonates with a decision you're facing, know that campus reporting looks different from a criminal case, it usually allows you to choose your level of involvement, and an advocate can walk through the options with you before you commit to anything at all.
Campus proceedings work differently from criminal court, and the rules vary by state and by school. Here is a general starting point if you are a student weighing whether to report.
This is supportive information, not legal or medical advice. If you need someone now, the RAINN hotline is 800-656-4673 — free and confidential, 24/7.
The change affects public access to identifying information about a student found responsible, not a reporting student's own privacy protections, which are generally already in place separately.
No. States take different approaches to balancing survivor privacy and public records, and this law reflects one state's particular choice this year.
That is part of the ongoing debate. Advocates on both sides raise real concerns, and this article aims to explain the change rather than settle that question.
A campus advocacy office or the RAINN National Sexual Assault Hotline, 800-656-4673, can talk through your options without any obligation to file anything.
Share only what feels okay. We’ll gently connect you with confidential support — no pressure, no cost.
Someone caring will reach out within a day. If you need to talk now, RAINN is here 24/7 at 800-656-4673.